“Biden Trump increases the national debt by 11% in two years”

This can be a corrected title of a deceptive (and usually statistically incompetent) article by Craig Eyermann in an Independent Institute blog post (beforehand highlighted as Ironman of PoliticalCalculations). He writes:

After two years in workplace, President Joe Biden doesn’t have many constructive achievements to to boast about.

…

However whereas his financial legacy does not look good, he is given People lasting expertise legacy. He elevated the US nationwide debt by 11% within the two years he held the Oval Workplace. That is actually saying one thing as a result of the nationwide debt was already $27.76 trillion the day he was sworn in.

Mr. Eyermann’s title is, so far as I do know, incorrect. Based on Treasury Department Debt Office (accessed 3/8/2023), on January 20, 2023, the gross federal debt was $31454980005742.4, and on January 20, 2021 it was $27751896236414.7. Utilizing Excel (to keep away from typos), I discover that the change over the 2 years is $3703083769327.70, not $3,695,343,467,324.62 (as proven within the Political Calculations Blog Post it refers). For the reason that quantity for January 20, 2023 matches my quantity and the quantity from the Treasury web site, I can solely conclude that he made a subtraction error. He additionally made a mistake in calculating the proportion development fee. I get 13.3% (not 11%) change. My recommendation – do not belief the maths in Unbiased Institute performs.

However there’s truly an even bigger drawback with Mr. Eyermann’s calculations. First, there isn’t a context as to what the others did of their first two years. Within the two years from January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2019*, the gross federal debt grew by 11.7% – throughout a interval of regular development (January 2019 predates the pandemic by greater than a 12 months – take Trump’s final two years and that is a 34.4% explosion).

Second, we might in all probability like to consider normalizing the debt burden by one thing. A method to do that is to have a look at the ratio of debt to potential GDP. Then we’ve got the next comparability (the place I’m now utilizing month-end debt figures).

Determine 1: Gross federal debt in billions of {dollars}, finish of month (blue, left scale) and gross federal debt in proportion factors of potential GDP (purple, proper scale). The numbers hooked up to the black arrows point out the adjustments over 2 years. Quarterly estimates of potential GDP transformed to month-to-month information utilizing the quadratic interpolation process in EViews. Orange shading signifies the Trump administration. Supply: Dallas Fed, CBOand the writer’s calculations.

Gross federal debt contains intra-governmental property (so debt held by the Social Safety Belief Fund, for instance). A extra applicable collection to contemplate is debt held by the general public (FRED FYGFDPUN collection). I haven’t got this collection on a month-to-month foundation, however I do have Federal Marketable Debt, which over the previous twenty years has moved very intently with the FYGFDPUN on a quarterly foundation (see Determine 4). Right here is the analogous chart utilizing marketable debt.

Determine 2: Federal marketable debt in billions of {dollars}, finish of month (blue, left scale) and federal marketable debt in proportion factors of potential GDP (purple, proper scale). The numbers hooked up to the black arrows point out the adjustments over 2 years. Quarterly estimates of potential GDP transformed to month-to-month information utilizing the quadratic interpolation process in EViews. Orange shading signifies the Trump administration. Supply: Dallas Fed, CBOand the writer’s calculations.

To evaluate the debt burden, one may wish to use the market worth fairly than the face worth of the debt. The face worth represents the rate of interest at situation, whereas the market worth represents the rate of interest prevailing on the time of statement. Utilizing market values ​​of marketable debt (principally, debt held by the general public), we get the next image.

Determine 3: Marketable Federal Debt in billions of {dollars}, finish of month (blue, left scale) and Marketable Federal Debt at market worth in proportion factors of potential GDP (purple, proper scale). The numbers hooked up to the black arrows point out the adjustments over 2 years. Quarterly estimates of potential GDP transformed to month-to-month information utilizing the quadratic interpolation process in EViews. Orange shading signifies the Trump administration. Supply: Dallas Fed, CBOand the writer’s calculations.

In different phrases, the Trump administration has elevated debt to potential GDP throughout an financial growth and has been an actual fiscal slut. even earlier than the Covid response.

Different analyzes by Mr. Eyermann, regarding the definition of externalities, probably the most helpful measures for monitoring financial exercise on the state degree, the econometrics of time collection, the addition/subtraction of weighted volumes in chain I, including/subtracting weighted volumes in chain II and reporting nominal vs precise volumes.

Annex: Comparability of marketable federal debt and federal debt held by the general public.

Determine 4: Federal marketable debt (blue), federal debt held by the general public, collection FRED FYGFDPUN (tan), in billions of $, finish of quarter. Orange shading signifies the Trump administration. Supply: Dallas Fed, CBOand the writer’s calculations.

* Truly refers back to the common of January 18 and January 22, 2019, since no information was reported for January 20.

.