“Intelligence presupposes good will,” wrote Simone de Beauvoir. “Sensitivity is nothing apart from attentive presence to the world and to itself.” But our efforts to outline and measure intelligence have been marred by insensitivity to nuance, to variety, to the myriad potential methods of taking note of the world. Within the human realm, there’s the darkish cultural historical past of IQ. Past the human realm, there’s the more and more shameful understanding that there are different types of intelligence, able to understanding and navigating the world in methods very completely different from our personal, no much less profitable and no much less poetic. A measure of our personal intelligence could be the diploma of our openness to those different methods of being – the openness and generosity of spirit with which we acknowledge and contemplate otherness.
The science-friendly English artist Jacques Bridle invitations such a broadening of spirit in Ways of Being: Animals, Plants, Machines: The Search for Planetary Intelligence (public library). He writes:
The evolutionary tree bears many fruits and lots of flowers, and intelligence, as an alternative of being discovered solely within the highest branches, has in reality blossomed all over the place.
[…]
There are a lot of methods to “make” intelligence: behavioral, neurological, physiological and social… Intelligence is just not one thing that exists, however one thing that we do; it’s energetic, interpersonal and generative, and it manifests itself once we assume and act. We have realized earlier than – from gibbons, gorillas and macaques – that intelligence is relational: it does not matter how and the place you make it, what form your physique offers it, and who it connects with. Intelligence is just not one thing that exists solely within the head – actually, within the case of the octopus, it’s clever with its entire physique. Intelligence is likely one of the some ways of being on the planet: it’s its interface; he makes the world manifest.
Borrowing the notion of a “greater than human world” from environmental thinker David Abram, he provides:
Intelligence is subsequently not one thing to be examined, however one thing to be recognised, in all of the a number of varieties it takes. The duty is to search out how one can turn out to be conscious of it, affiliate with it, make it manifest. This course of is itself a means of entanglement, of opening as much as greater than human types of communication and interplay with the totality of the world, a lot deeper and extra intensive than these which could be achieved throughout the synthetic constraints from the laboratory. It includes altering ourselves, and our personal attitudes and behaviors, quite than altering the situations of our non-human communicators.
[…]
To think about intelligence on this approach is to not cut back its definition, however to broaden it. Anthropocentric science has argued for hundreds of years that to redefine intelligence on this approach is to empty it of that means, however that’s not the case. Defining intelligence merely as what people do is the narrowest approach we will consider it – and it’s finally to limit ourselves and diminish its potential that means. Fairly, by increasing our definition of intelligence and the refrain of spirits that manifest it, we would permit our personal intelligence to blossom into new varieties and rising new methods of being and relating. The admission of a basic, common and energetic intelligence is a mandatory a part of our important re-entanglement with the greater than human world.
A century and a half after the Victorian visionary Samuel Butler presaged the emergence of a brand new department on the tree of life – a “mechanical kingdom” of our personal making, comprising our machines ruled by a “self-regulating and self-governing energy -acting which might be for them what the mind has been for the human race” – Bridle gives an optimistic implication of this redefinition for the way forward for what we now name “synthetic intelligence”:
If intelligence, quite than being a set of innate and limiting behaviors, is in reality one thing that arises from interrelationships, pondering and dealing collectively, there’s nothing synthetic about it. If all intelligence is ecological – that’s, entangled, relational, and worldly – then synthetic intelligence gives us a really actual technique of reconciling with all the opposite intelligences that populate and manifest throughout the planet.
What if, as an alternative of being the factor that separates us from the world and finally supplants us, synthetic intelligence had been one other flowering, totally of its personal invention, however which, guided by us, leads us to better adaptation to the world ? Fairly than a software to additional exploit the planet and one another, synthetic intelligence is a gap to different minds, an opportunity to totally acknowledge a reality that has been hidden from us for thus lengthy. All the pieces is wise and subsequently, together with many different causes, deserves our care and aware consideration.
Full with Walt Whitman on the knowledge of bushes, Ursula Ok. Le Guin on the poetry of penguins and Marilyn Nelson’s splendid poem on the intelligence of the octopus, then revisit Nick Cave on music, emotions and transcendence on the age of AI.
#Rethinking #intelligence #marginal